74 / 100

Geckoboard pricing teardown

https://www.geckoboard.com/pricing

Geckoboard's pricing page is clean and well-structured with a clear 3-tier good-better-best model, a highlighted Performance plan, and a detailed feature comparison table. The 20% annual discount is prominently surfaced via a toggle, and a 14-day free trial with no credit card friction lowers entry barriers significantly. The main weaknesses are the relatively large price jump from Essentials ($79) to Performance ($319) with limited mid-tier bridging, and the fact that only annual billing is shown for public prices, which may create friction for monthly-minded buyers.

Tier structure

Essentials

$79/mo (billed annually)

Performance

$319/mo (billed annually)

Enterprise

Contact us

Value metric

flat-rate per tier with usage limits (dashboards, editors, screens)

How limits scale

Dashboards 2+ ($24/each to add) → 20 → Custom
Editors 1+ ($20/each to add) → 3 → Custom
Screens 1+ ($20/each to add) → 5 → Custom
Viewers Unlimited → Unlimited → Unlimited
Data Volume Limited → High → Additional (custom)

Escalation logic

Tiers escalate from a minimal shared-view entry plan (Essentials) to a team-action-oriented plan with alerts, drilldowns, and templates (Performance), then to a custom enterprise tier for complex orgs. Each tier is additive, with Performance unlocking advanced features entirely absent from Essentials rather than just raising limits.

Psychological anchors

  • Highlighted recommended plan — Performance is visually distinguished with a darker/contrasting card background and is positioned center, acting as the decoy anchor between Essentials and Enterprise.
  • Annual/monthly toggle with explicit savings callout — The toggle prominently labels 'Save 20%' on the annual option, defaulting to annual to make prices appear lower and nudge commitment.
  • Enterprise as high-price anchor — The 'Let's talk' Enterprise tier with no public price anchors perception that Performance ($319) is the rational, accessible choice for most teams.
  • Free trial as entry anchor — A 14-day free trial with no credit card required is offered on both Essentials and Performance, reducing signup friction and anchoring users to the product before a purchase decision.
  • À la carte add-on pricing on Essentials — Essentials lists per-unit add-on prices ($24/dashboard, $20/editor, $20/screen, $40/custom themes), which makes the Performance flat bundle feel like better value by comparison.
  • Social proof / logo wall — Recognizable brand logos (Monday.com, Honeywell, Huel, Gousto, etc.) and G2/Capterra badges are displayed below the plans to build trust at the moment of pricing consideration.

What this page is optimizing for

The page is primarily optimized for self-serve conversion on the Performance plan, using a free trial CTA on both lower tiers, transparent pricing, and a detailed feature comparison table to let buyers qualify themselves. Enterprise lead-gen is secondary, with a soft 'Contact us' CTA rather than aggressive gating.

Red flags

  • The price jump from Essentials ($79) to Performance ($319) is 4x — well above the healthy 2-3x norm — with no intermediate tier to catch teams who outgrow Essentials but can't justify $319.
  • Monthly pricing is not publicly shown; only annual prices are displayed, which may alienate buyers who want to trial at monthly rates before committing annually.
  • The Essentials plan's à la carte add-on structure (pay per dashboard, editor, screen) creates unpredictable cost scaling and could feel punishing as teams grow, potentially undermining trust.
  • The 'data volume' limit is vague ('Limited' vs 'High' vs 'Additional') with no concrete numbers, which may cause anxiety for data-heavy prospects evaluating Essentials.
  • Custom themes cost $40 extra on Essentials but are included in Performance — this is a meaningful differentiator but is buried in fine print rather than highlighted as an upgrade trigger.
  • No 'Most Popular' badge is visible on the screenshot despite Performance being the featured plan — the visual highlight alone may not be enough to direct attention clearly.

Best-practices scorecard

What works · 5

  • Visible prices — Essentials and Performance show clear monthly-equivalent prices billed annually; only Enterprise is hidden behind 'Contact us', which is standard practice.
  • Annual discount offered — A monthly/annual toggle with an explicit 'Save 20%' label is present and defaults to annual.
  • Tier differences are scannable — A detailed feature comparison table below the hero cards clearly maps every feature across all three tiers with checkmarks and dashes.
  • FAQ or objection handling — A dedicated FAQ section addresses payment options, cancellation, non-profit discounts, data security, and data volume — covering the most common purchase objections.
  • Trust signals present — Customer logo wall, G2/Capterra review badges, and security/data handling bullet points are all present on the page.

Half measures · 3

  • Clear recommended tier — Performance is visually highlighted with a contrasting card, but there is no explicit 'Most Popular' or 'Recommended' badge to reinforce the signal.
  • Value metric matches usage — Flat-rate tiers with dashboard/editor/screen limits work for TV-dashboard use cases, but the add-on pricing on Essentials introduces complexity that blurs the value metric.
  • Clear CTAs per tier — 'Try for free' CTAs on Essentials and Performance are clear, but the Enterprise CTA ('Contact us') lacks urgency or specificity about what happens next.