78 / 100

GanttPRO pricing teardown

https://ganttpro.com/pricing

GanttPRO's pricing page is transparent and self-serve friendly, with visible per-seat prices across four tiers, a detailed comparison table, and a strikethrough-discounted Enterprise tier used as both anchor and lead-gen hook. The structure is clear and scannable, though Enterprise blends self-serve pricing with 'Get a quote'/'Contact sales' CTAs, slightly muddying the funnel.

Tier structure

Core

$7/mo

Advanced

$10/mo

Business

$17/mo

Enterprise

$20/mo (was $30)

Value metric

per seat, with team-size selector adjusting per-user price

How limits scale

Reports No No Yes Yes
Workload/Portfolio/Budget management No No Yes Yes
Custom roles & rights No No No Yes
SAML SSO No No No Yes
API / Jira Cloud integration No No Yes Yes

Escalation logic

Each tier layers on top of the previous ('Everything in X, plus...'), moving from basic Gantt/task visualization (Core) to automation and templates (Advanced) to portfolio/budget/workload management (Business) to security, compliance, and support controls (Enterprise).

Psychological anchors

  • Strikethrough pricing — Enterprise shows '$30 → $20 USD' framed as a 'Limited offer', creating urgency and a reference-price anchor.
  • Highlighted/recommended tier — Enterprise card is visually distinct (dark background, white CTA button) among the otherwise uniform light cards, drawing the eye as the premium anchor even though it's not explicitly labeled 'Most Popular'.
  • Annual vs monthly toggle — Toggle defaults to 'Annually' with a '-20%' badge, nudging users toward higher LTV commitment.
  • Team-size selector — Dropdown ('Select team size: 20 members') dynamically adjusts per-seat pricing, reinforcing volume-based value framing and 'lower price per user for larger teams' messaging.
  • Social proof / trust signals — Logos of NASA, Sony, Nvidia, Mercedes, Booking.com, Nestlé, Michelin, Salesforce plus '1000+ reviews' rating and '1M+ project managers' claim sit directly under pricing cards.
  • Multiple quote/discount capture forms — Separate lead forms for 'Get Enterprise discount', 'Get 30% off Enterprise', and 'Get a tailored quote' create several conversion paths and capture intent data even for lower tiers via 'Get a quote' links.

What this page is optimizing for

Primarily self-serve conversion for Core/Advanced/Business (visible prices, instant 'Try for free' CTAs, no credit card trial) while using Enterprise as both a lead-gen anchor and an expansion path via 'Get the deal'/quote forms.

Red flags

  • Enterprise tier mixes a visible discounted price with 'Custom price'/'Get a quote' language, creating ambiguity about whether it's truly self-serve or sales-assisted.
  • The feature comparison table is long (30+ rows collapsed under 'See all'), which could overwhelm users trying to scan differences quickly.
  • Multiple overlapping lead-capture forms (discount, 30% off, tailored quote) for the same Enterprise tier may confuse users about which offer is current.
  • No explicit 'Most Popular' or 'Recommended' badge text, so the decoy effect relies solely on color/visual weight rather than clear labeling.

Best-practices scorecard

What works · 6

  • Visible prices — All four tiers show exact per-seat annual pricing on the page.
  • Annual discount offered — Monthly/Annually toggle shows a -20% badge, defaulting to annual.
  • Value metric matches usage — Per-seat pricing with a team-size selector aligns cost with actual team scale.
  • FAQ or objection handling — FAQ covers trials, payment methods, nonprofit discounts, upgrades, and security.
  • Trust signals present — Enterprise logos (NASA, Sony, Nvidia, Salesforce), review rating, and '1M+ project managers' claim are all shown.
  • Clear CTAs per tier — Each tier has a distinct CTA ('Try for free' vs 'Get the deal'), though Enterprise's mixed messaging slightly weakens clarity.

Half measures · 2

  • Clear recommended tier — Enterprise is visually highlighted but not explicitly labeled as 'recommended' or 'most popular'.
  • Tier differences are scannable — Card summaries are clear, but the full comparison table is very long and requires expanding 'See all'.