TimeSolv pricing teardown
https://www.timesolv.com/pricingTimeSolv's pricing page is a clean, simple two-tier per-seat model with transparent prices and a monthly/annual toggle, which is rare and welcome in legal SaaS. However, only two plans limits upgrade paths, feature differences beyond a comparison table are thin, and volume/enterprise pricing is pushed to 'inquire with sales,' diluting the self-serve simplicity.
Tier structure
TimeSolv Pro
$33/user/month (paid annually)
TimeSolv Legal
$44/user/month (paid annually), Most Popular
Value metric
per user/seat, monthly or annual billing
How limits scale
Escalation logic
Pro covers core time, billing, and practice management; Legal adds law-specific compliance tools (trust accounting, LEDES billing, conflict checks) on top of everything in Pro, with additional users requiring a sales inquiry for volume pricing.
Psychological anchors
- Most Popular badge — TimeSolv Legal is marked 'Most Popular' and highlighted, steering users to the higher-priced tier.
- Annual discount toggle — Monthly/Annually toggle with 'Extra savings!' label and strikethrough pricing ($43→$33, $58→$44) showing 25% off first year.
- Free trial as entry point — 'Try for Free' CTA and 10-day free trial with no credit card required lowers signup friction.
- Strikethrough/charm pricing — Original prices ($43, $58) shown crossed out next to discounted $33/$44 to emphasize savings.
- Sales-gated volume pricing — Adding more users or needing bulk pricing requires contacting sales, reserving upsell for high-value accounts.
What this page is optimizing for
The page is primarily built for self-serve conversion — visible prices, per-seat clarity, free trial, and direct CTAs — while nudging larger accounts and volume needs into a sales-assisted funnel via 'inquire with sales.'
Red flags
- Only two plans creates a shallow good-better structure with no lower-cost entry tier or higher-end enterprise anchor.
- Feature comparison table differences between Pro and Legal are not obvious at a glance in the main cards, requiring users to scroll to the detailed feature matrix.
- Volume pricing for additional users is hidden behind a 'inquire with sales' link rather than shown transparently.
- Add-ons (CRM, Websites, Pay) are priced separately and not integrated into the main tier comparison, adding complexity to total cost of ownership.
- No visible enterprise/custom tier to anchor high-end value against the two shown plans.
Best-practices scorecard
What works · 5
- Clear recommended tier — TimeSolv Legal is clearly marked 'Most Popular'.
- Visible prices — Both plans show exact per-user monthly prices with annual/monthly toggle.
- Annual discount offered — Annual billing shows clear savings with strikethrough pricing and 25% off messaging.
- FAQ or objection handling — FAQ section addresses trial, billing, contracts, payment types, and data security.
- Clear CTAs per tier — Each plan card has a distinct 'Try for Free' CTA plus global 'Schedule a demo' options.
Half measures · 3
- Value metric matches usage — Per-seat pricing is standard but volume pricing for more users is opaque, requiring sales contact.
- Tier differences are scannable — Main cards list only a few differentiators; full comparison requires scrolling to a long collapsible feature table.
- Trust signals present — Testimonials are included but no logos, certifications, or case studies are visible.