72 / 100

Duda pricing teardown

https://www.duda.co/pricing

Duda's pricing page is dense but transparent, with visible prices for four self-serve tiers plus a Custom enterprise plan, a clear 'Best Value' anchor on Agency, and an exhaustive comparison table. The site-based value metric (published projects + à la carte site add-ons) is unusual and adds complexity, and the sheer volume of features/limits crammed into one table creates cognitive overload despite decent structure.

Tier structure

Basic

$19/mo (annual)

Team

$29/mo (annual)

Agency

$52/mo (annual, Best Value)

White Label

$149/mo (annual)

Custom

Contact us

Value metric

Flat-rate per account tier, gated by included published projects/sites, team seats, and feature access (with a separate AI Visibility usage-based add-on)

How limits scale

Included published projects 1 1 4 4 Custom
Team seats 3 3 6 6/Custom Custom
Monthly AI credits 150 150 150 150 Custom
Support level Email Email Priority Priority 24/7 VIP
MCP access Standard Standard Advanced

Escalation logic

Tiers escalate primarily by number of included websites, team seats, support level, and white-labeling depth rather than raw usage, positioning Agency as the 'best value' bundle and White Label/Custom as the branding and scale endpoints.

Psychological anchors

  • Best Value badge — Agency plan is visually highlighted with a gradient background and 'BEST VALUE' label, nudging buyers toward the mid-upper tier.
  • Annual discount toggle — Monthly/Annual toggle advertises 'Save up to 25%', with annual prices shown by default (e.g. $19 vs $25 for Basic).
  • Enterprise anchor — Custom 'Contact us' tier sits above White Label at $149/mo, implying even greater value/scale without revealing a ceiling price.
  • Free trial with no credit card — 14-day free trial and 30-day money-back guarantee reduce signup friction and de-risk the decision.
  • Bundled value framing — FAQ explicitly states Agency's 4 included sites represent a '$76/month value,' reinforcing the anchor pricing logic.
  • Separate upsell add-on anchoring — The AI Visibility add-on has its own 4-tier pricing ladder ($19-$195/mo) with its own 'Best Value' badge, mirroring the main page's anchor tactic.

What this page is optimizing for

The page is built primarily for self-serve conversion (visible prices, instant 'Start free trial' CTAs, annual toggle) while also supporting expansion revenue via per-site add-on pricing and a Custom/Contact-sales tier for high-volume agencies — the layered upsell structure (site add-ons, AI Visibility add-on, Custom plan) shows a clear expansion-revenue design intent.

Red flags

  • Value metric mixing flat tiers with per-site add-on pricing ($19/mo or $17/mo per additional site) adds pricing complexity uncommon among competitors.
  • Comparison table is extremely long with dozens of feature rows, risking cognitive overload and burying key differentiators.
  • Monthly AI Credits are identical (150) across all four paid tiers, undermining it as a differentiator despite being listed prominently in each tier.
  • A live chat widget ('Meet Our Duda AI Experts') overlaps the pricing table in the screenshot, potentially obstructing key plan info.
  • Multiple similar limits (e.g., team seats shown as both 'seats' and 'team seats' with slightly different values in different table instances) create minor inconsistency risk.
  • Custom tier pricing is fully opaque with no indicative range, common enterprise pattern but adds friction for prospects trying to self-qualify.

Best-practices scorecard

What works · 5

  • Clear recommended tier — Agency is explicitly flagged 'Best Value' with distinct visual styling.
  • Visible prices — All tiers except Custom show exact monthly/annual prices upfront.
  • Annual discount offered — Toggle advertises up to 25% savings, with annual pricing shown by default.
  • FAQ or objection handling — Extensive FAQ section covers pricing logic, AI credits, migrations, hosting, and more.
  • Clear CTAs per tier — Each tier has a 'Start free trial' or 'Contact us' button, with 'Buy plan'/'Upgrade plan' options for logged-in users.

Half measures · 3

  • Value metric matches usage — Site/project-based pricing plus flat AI credit allowances across tiers makes the metric feel arbitrary rather than usage-aligned.
  • Tier differences are scannable — A comparison table exists but is very long with dozens of granular rows, making quick scanning difficult.
  • Trust signals present — One customer quote is shown, but no logos, review scores, or case study stats appear directly on the pricing page.