Lodgify pricing teardown
https://www.lodgify.com/pricingLodgify's pricing page is a well-executed self-serve funnel with four transparent, escalating tiers, a clear 'Most Popular' anchor, and a large feature-comparison table, but its property-count gating (Basic/Starter capped at 1-2 properties) adds a hidden second value metric that isn't obvious from the price cards alone.
Tier structure
Basic
$14/mo
Starter
$26/mo
Professional
$42/mo
Ultimate
$62/mo
Value metric
flat monthly subscription tiered by feature set, with hidden per-property caps on lower tiers
How limits scale
Escalation logic
Tiers escalate in a strict additive good-better-best pattern, with each plan explicitly stating it includes 'everything in' the tier(s) below plus new capabilities like website builder, automation, or team/owner tools.
Psychological anchors
- Most Popular badge — Ultimate (highest tier) is labeled 'Most Popular' in the hero cards, anchoring users toward the priciest plan rather than a mid-tier decoy.
- Strikethrough pricing — Every tier shows a crossed-out higher price (e.g. $18 → $14, $77 → $62) next to a 'Save 20%' badge, framing the displayed price as a discount.
- Annual/Bi-Yearly toggle — Monthly vs Yearly (20% off) vs Bi-Yearly (25% off) toggle pushes users toward longer commitments with escalating discounts.
- Free trial as low-friction entry — 'Start free trial' and '7 days free, no credit card required' appears repeatedly as the primary CTA across the page.
- Social proof stacking — Trustpilot, Capterra, and Google review badges with review counts (5,000+, 3,400+, 1,200+) appear near pricing and testimonials to reduce purchase anxiety.
What this page is optimizing for
The page is optimized for self-serve conversion — prices are fully visible, CTAs are instant ('Get Basic/Starter/Professional/Ultimate', 'Start free trial') with no 'Contact sales' gating, and a detailed comparison table plus FAQ section are designed to remove friction without needing a sales call.
Red flags
- Basic and Starter plans are capped at 1 and 2 properties respectively, a significant limit not obvious from the top-level price cards, only revealed in small print under the CTA button.
- The compare-plans table includes a mysterious duplicate 'Starter' row with a blank price ($-/mo, $46.99 crossed out) that appears to be a rendering/data error, hurting scannability.
- Currency-only toggle (EUR/USD/GBP) but no visible mention of what happens to pricing at higher property counts beyond the free tiers, leaving growth costs unclear.
- Feature comparison table is very long with many collapsed sub-categories (Channel Manager, Guest Messaging, Payments, etc.), which may overwhelm rather than clarify differences.
- Some add-ons (Damage Protection, Smart Locks, Dynamic Pricing) are promoted without any indication of their price, breaking pricing transparency for the full product.
Best-practices scorecard
What works · 5
- Visible prices — All four core plans show explicit monthly prices with discount framing.
- Annual discount offered — Monthly, Yearly (20% off), and Bi-Yearly (25% off) toggle options are all present.
- FAQ or objection handling — A categorized FAQ section covers commissions, contracts, payment methods, and plan switching.
- Trust signals present — Review counts and logos from Trustpilot, Capterra, and Google, plus multiple customer testimonials, are prominently displayed.
- Clear CTAs per tier — Each plan has a distinct 'Get [Plan]' button plus a persistent 'Start free trial' CTA throughout the page.
Half measures · 3
- Clear recommended tier — All four tiers are labeled 'Most Popular' in the compare section, which dilutes the signal even though Ultimate is visually highlighted in yellow on the hero cards.
- Value metric matches usage — Pricing is flat per feature tier but silently gated by number of properties, which isn't disclosed until you read fine print under the CTA.
- Tier differences are scannable — Card-level differences are clear and additive, but the full comparison table is long and feature-dense, requiring significant scrolling/expanding.