Activepieces vs Pipedream Pricing (2026)
How do these two stack up on price? Here's what each one costs, what you get, and where the value sits.
| Activepieces | Pipedream | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at | Custom | $29/mo |
| Number of plans | 2 | 5 |
| Free plan | ||
| Free trial | — | — |
| Pricing model | usage-based | usage-based |
Standard
- 10 free active flows
- Unlimited runs
- AI agents
- Unlimited MCP servers
- Unlimited tables
- Community support
Ultimate
- Team & Personal Projects
- Piece Access Controls
- Global Connections
- Custom RBAC
- SSO
- Audit Logs
Free
- 1M AI tokens
- 3 active workflows
- 3 connected accounts
- Unlimited workflow testing
- Pipedream Connect in development
Basic
- 20M AI tokens
- No usage limit (2k credits included)
- 10 active workflows
- 5 connected accounts
Advanced
Popular- 50M AI tokens
- Control flow operators
- Unlimited workflows
- Unlimited connected accounts
- Premium apps
- GitHub Sync
Connect
- Pipedream Connect in production
- Auth for 100 external users
- $2 per additional user
Business
- Volume pricing
- Custom invoicing
- Priority integration development
- Dedicated support in Slack
- Support for HIPAA workloads
- Uptime and availability SLAs
Activepieces vs Pipedream FAQ
- Which one is cheaper?
- One or both use custom pricing, so it depends on your specific needs.
- Can I use either one for free?
- Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.
- How do they charge?
- Both use a usage-based model, so the comparison is straightforward — it comes down to features and limits at each price point.
- Which one is a better deal?
- Depends on what you need. Activepieces: They're positioning as the open-source-friendly, budget-conscious alternative to Zapier and Make — the MIT-licensed self-hosted option alone signals they're hunting developer-led teams and cost-sensitive buyers who'd otherwise roll their own. Not the cheapest if you scale flows aggressively, but the entry point is hard to argue with. Pipedream: Pipedream sits below Zapier and Make on price for technical users, deliberately targeting developers who find no-code tools too limiting. They're not competing on simplicity — they're competing on flexibility and API-first design, which puts them closer to n8n or Temporal than to Zapier.
Keep tabs on both.
We'll monitor pricing changes for Activepieces and Pipedream and let you know when something moves.