Baseten vs tl;dv Pricing (2026)

Price is one row. To weigh the features too, use our feature comparison template →

Which one is cheaper?

One or both use custom pricing, so it depends on your specific needs.

Can I use either one for free?

Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.

How do they charge?

Different approach here. Baseten uses usage-based pricing, while tl;dv goes with per-seat. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. Baseten: Sitting in the middle-to-premium range for ML infra, Baseten isn't competing on being the cheapest raw GPU hours — that's a race to the bottom against hyperscalers. Instead they're chasing teams that want managed model-serving infrastructure without building it themselves, using the free entry point to hook developers before upselling the production-grade tiers. tl;dv: At $18-29/seat, tl;dv undercuts heavyweights like Gong or Chorus by a wide margin while still competing feature-for-feature with other AI meeting recorders like Fireflies or Fathom. They're clearly hunting the mid-market and SMB crowd that wants Gong-like insights without the enterprise sales call and six-figure contract.

Still deciding? See the best Baseten alternatives or the best tl;dv alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.