BrowserStack vs Qase Pricing (2026)
How do these two stack up on price? Here's what each one costs, what you get, and where the value sits.
| BrowserStack | Qase | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at | $19/mo | $42/mo |
| Number of plans | 7 | 3 |
| Free plan | ||
| Free trial | ||
| Pricing model | per-seat | per-seat |
Team
- Team Access to 30,000+ Real iOS & Android Device Units
- Collaborative Debugging & Testing with Mobile DevTools
- Increased Productivity with Bookmarks & Integrations like Jira, Slack, Github & more
- Test network conditions (No Network/3G/4G)
- Localisation Testing with IP and GPS geolocation from 100+ countries
- Access Team's Test History & Instantly Relaunch Same Sessions
- Exclude Internal Traffic from Google Analytics
Team Pro
- Test on 4 devices simultaneouly in one tab
- Test 4x faster with synced interactions between devices
- Test Payments (Apple Pay and GPay) and 2FA with OTP/SMS with SIM-enabled devices
- Screenreader testing with voiceover, talkback, and NVDA
- Test Image and video capture, QR code scanning, File upload/downloads
- Access to Android and iOS Settings, like general accessibility, display, timezone etc
- Pre-loaded extensions for live sessions
- Avoid re-login hassle with login state maintenance on session time-outs
Team Ultimate
Popular- Live (Team Pro)
- Bug Capture (Team)
- Requestly Pro (HTTP Interceptor)
- Accessibility Workflow Analyzer
- Common Workflow Automation
- Visual Overlay
- Other tools
- Test Case Generator Agent (10 PRD uploads per user per month)
- Proofreader Agent
- Form Filler
Volume
- Reduced cost per user
- Effortlessly scale across teams
- Test on 4 devices simultaneouly in one tab
- Test 4x faster with synced interactions between devices
- Test Payments (Apple Pay and GPay) and 2FA with OTP/SMS with SIM-enabled devices
- Screenreader testing with voiceover, talkback, JAWs and NVDA
- Test Image and video capture, QR code scanning, File upload/downloads
- Access to Android and iOS Settings, like general accessibility, display, timezone etc
- Pre-loaded extensions for live sessions
- Avoid re-login hassle with login state maintenance on session time-outs
Desktop
- Instant Access to 3000+ Desktop Browsers
- Unlimited Testing Minutes
- All Windows & Mac Versions (since 2008)
- Latest OS (Windows & MAC) Day 0 support
- Localhost, Staging, and Private Website Testing
- Web performance on devices
- 24X7 Active Support via Email
Desktop & Mobile
- 30,000+ Real iOS & Android Device Units
- Test on Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari latest browser versions
- Network logs, Performance, Inspector etc for Quick Debugging
- Localhost, Staging, and Private Website Testing Across Devices
- 21 Data Centres Across 13 Global Locations
Freelancer Plan*
- 100 minutes of Live - Desktop & Mobile. Only 1 user/account.
Free
- Up to 2 projects
- 500 Mb storage
- 30-day test history
- 5k/mo API results
- MCP Server
Teams
Popular- Unlimited projects, test runs & storage
- Single sign-on (SAML 2.0)
- Role-based access control
- 2,000/mo AI credits*
- 2-year test history
- Test case review
- Qase query language
- Requirements traceability
- 35+ integrations
Enterprise
- Unlimited users
- Multi-workspace SSO & SCIM provisioning
- MFA & IP restriction
- Audit logs & private attachments
- 4,000/mo AI credits*
- Unlimited data retention
- Dedicated support team
- 24/5 support SLA
BrowserStack vs Qase FAQ
- Which one is cheaper?
- BrowserStack starts lower at $19/mo, compared to $42/mo for Qase.
- Can I use either one for free?
- Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.
- How do they charge?
- Both use a per-seat model, so the comparison is straightforward — it comes down to features and limits at each price point.
- Which one is a better deal?
- Depends on what you need. BrowserStack: BrowserStack is the premium incumbent in cross-browser testing — they're not competing on price, they're competing on breadth of real device coverage and brand trust. At $150-$375/mo for small teams, they're meaningfully more expensive than challengers like LambdaTest, which is clearly fine with them — they're targeting teams where testing infrastructure failure is a real cost. Qase: Teams at $42/user/mo sits in the mid-market range for test management tools — not as cheap as TestRail's entry points, not as expensive as full-suite players like Zephyr Scale bundled into Jira. They're clearly targeting growing engineering teams that have outgrown spreadsheets but aren't ready for enterprise procurement cycles.
Still deciding? See the best BrowserStack alternatives or the best Qase alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.
Keep tabs on both.
We'll monitor pricing changes for BrowserStack and Qase and let you know when something moves.