Buildkite vs Octopus Deploy Pricing (2026)
How do these two stack up on price? Here's what each one costs, what you get, and where the value sits.
| Buildkite | Octopus Deploy | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at | $30/mo | Custom |
| Number of plans | 3 | 3 |
| Free plan | ||
| Free trial | ||
| Pricing model | per-seat | flat-rate |
Personal
- Self-hosted agents
- Active users
- Build retention
- Waterfall view
- Pause queues
- Job retries report
- Test executions
- Workflows
- Real-time flaky test identification
- Test suite insights
- Test ownership
- Team reporting
- Test splitting
- Storage & bandwidth
- Registries
- Private registries
- Linux vCPU minutes
- Linux vCPU concurrency
- Linux shapes
- Git mirror volumes
- Custom agent images
- Team permissions
- GitHub auth
Pro
- Self-hosted agents
- Active users
- Build retention
- Waterfall view
- Pause queues
- Job retries report
- GitHub Enterprise support
- Bitbucket Server support
- Managed tests
- Test executions
- Workflows
- Real-time flaky test identification
- Test suite insights
- Test ownership
- Team reporting
- Test splitting
- Test state management
- Auto-quarantine
- Storage & bandwidth
- Registries
- Private registries
- Remote dependency mirroring
- Arbitrary files
- Large packages
- Linux vCPU minutes
- Linux vCPU concurrency
- Linux shapes
- M4 Mac vCPU minutes
- M4 Mac vCPU concurrency
- M4 Mac shapes
- Git mirror volumes
- Custom agent images
- Cache volumes
- Team permissions
- GitHub auth
- Signed pipelines
- Single sign on
- API access overview
- Priority email support
Enterprise
- Self-hosted agents
- Active users
- Build retention
- Waterfall view
- Pause queues
- Job retries report
- GitHub Enterprise support
- Bitbucket Server support
- Historical build exports
- Pipeline templates
- Managed tests
- Test executions
- Workflows
- Real-time flaky test identification
- Test suite insights
- Test ownership
- Team reporting
- Test splitting
- Test state management
- Auto-quarantine
- Data warehouse export (Coming soon)
- Storage & bandwidth
- Registries
- Private registries
- Remote dependency mirroring
- Arbitrary files
- Large packages
- Branded endpoints
- Virtual registries
- Software (SLSA) provenance
- License checks
- Threat scanning
- Linux vCPU minutes
- Linux vCPU concurrency
- Linux shapes
- M4 Mac vCPU minutes
- M4 Mac vCPU concurrency
- M4 Mac shapes
- Git mirror volumes
- Custom agent images
- Cache volumes
- Internal container registry
- Remote Docker builds
- Team permissions
- Member permissions
- System banners
- GitHub auth
- Signed pipelines
- Single sign on
- API access overview
- SCIM, custom SAML & ADFS
- Private log storage
- Activity log
- Inactive user list
- Inactive API token revocation
- SSO session IP address pinning
- Priority email support
- Invoice payment
- Consolidated billing
Free
- All core features
- 10 projects
- 10 tenants
- 10 machines
- 1 space
- 10 users
- 5 concurrent tasks
- 1TB file storage
- 100GB database storage
- Runbook automation
- Environment promotion
- SSO
- RBAC
- Community support
Professional
- All core features
- Best for under 100 projects
- Tenants as add-ons
- Machines as add-ons
- Unlimited spaces
- Unlimited users
- Default of 5 concurrent tasks
- 1TB file storage
- 100GB database storage
- Runbook automation
- Environment promotion
- SSO
- RBAC
- 8/5 support (9–5pm weekdays)
Enterprise
- All core features
- Best for over 100 projects
- Tenants as add-ons
- Machines as add-ons
- Unlimited spaces
- Unlimited users
- Default of 20 concurrent tasks
- Contact Sales for file storage
- Contact Sales for database storage
- Runbook automation
- Environment promotion
- SSO
- RBAC
- 24/7 support
- Platform Hub
- Global deployment freezes
- Priority deployments
- Insights & DORA metrics
- SIEM audit log streaming
- ITSM integration
- Azure Private Link connection
- Custom billing
- Add-on: Premium support
Buildkite vs Octopus Deploy FAQ
- Which one is cheaper?
- One or both use custom pricing, so it depends on your specific needs.
- Can I use either one for free?
- Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.
- How do they charge?
- Different approach here. Buildkite uses per-seat pricing, while Octopus Deploy goes with flat-rate. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.
- Which one is a better deal?
- Depends on what you need. Buildkite: At $30/seat, they're mid-market — not undercutting GitHub Actions or CircleCI's entry points, but not charging Harness-level enterprise premiums either. They're going after teams that have outgrown basic CI but aren't ready to negotiate six-figure contracts. Octopus Deploy: Sitting above open-source alternatives like ArgoCD or Jenkins but below the full-platform cost of something like Harness or Azure DevOps at scale, Octopus is pitching itself as the serious-but-not-enterprise-bloated option. They're clearly going after mid-market engineering teams who've outgrown DIY CI/CD pipelines.
Keep tabs on both.
We'll monitor pricing changes for Buildkite and Octopus Deploy and let you know when something moves.