Buildkite vs Octopus Deploy Pricing (2026)
How do these two stack up on price? Here's what each one costs, what you get, and where the value sits.
| Buildkite | Octopus Deploy | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at | $30/mo | $4330/mo |
| Number of plans | 3 | 3 |
| Free plan | ||
| Free trial | ||
| Pricing model | per-seat | hybrid |
Free Plan
- Up to 5 users
- Up to 10 concurrent jobs
- Up to 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes per month
- Up to 250k test executions per month
- Dynamic pipelines
- Community support
Pro Plan
- Up to 50 users
- Up to 250 concurrent agents, 10 included
- Includes 4,000 Linux vCPU minutes per month with access to macOS agents, larger machine sizes, and higher concurrency
- 1M test executions per month
- Dynamic pipelines
- Priority email support
Enterprise Plan
- Custom usage and rate limits
- Full access to Buildkite's testing platform
- Buildkite hosted agents with remote Docker builders, private container registry, largest machine sizes, Linux ARM64, and scalable concurrency
- Custom storage and retention policies for builds, artifacts, and logs
- Dynamic pipelines
- 99.95% platform uptime commitment
- SCIM, custom SAML & ADFS
- Private log and artifact storage
- Audit log exports
- Observability integrations, including EventBridge and SIEM
- Advanced governance and control
- Access to Enterprise support with SLA credits
- Priority response times
- Slack Connect
Free
- All core features
- 10 projects
- 10 tenants
Professional
- All core features
Enterprise
- All core features
Buildkite vs Octopus Deploy FAQ
- Which one is cheaper?
- Buildkite starts lower at $30/mo, compared to $4330/mo for Octopus Deploy.
- Can I use either one for free?
- Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.
- How do they charge?
- Different approach here. Buildkite uses per-seat pricing, while Octopus Deploy goes with hybrid. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.
- Which one is a better deal?
- Depends on what you need. Buildkite: At $30/seat, Buildkite sits mid-to-premium compared to usage-based tools that can look cheaper on paper but spike unpredictably with build volume. They're clearly courting engineering teams who've been burned by surprise CI bills and want the trade-off of predictable per-seat cost even if it means paying for people who rarely trigger builds. Octopus Deploy: At over $4K/month for the paid entry tier, Octopus Cloud is priced like a premium, ops-critical tool rather than a scrappy CI/CD add-on — this isn't competing with cheap pipeline plugins, it's going after teams already spending real money on release management. They're clearly chasing mid-market to enterprise DevOps teams who've outgrown janky in-house scripts, not hobbyists.
Still deciding? See the best Buildkite alternatives or the best Octopus Deploy alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.
Keep tabs on both.
We'll monitor pricing changes for Buildkite and Octopus Deploy and let you know when something moves. See how competitor pricing monitoring works.