Chromatic vs GitHub Pricing (2026)

Which one is cheaper?

GitHub is the cheaper option, starting at $4/mo vs $179/mo for Chromatic.

Can I use either one for free?

Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.

How do they charge?

Different approach here. Chromatic uses usage-based pricing, while GitHub goes with per-seat. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. Chromatic: At $179-399/mo before Enterprise, Chromatic sits mid-to-premium for a specialized visual testing tool — it's not competing on price against generic QA platforms, it's justifying the spend to teams already sold on Storybook-driven workflows. They're chasing teams that have outgrown manual visual QA and need automated snapshot testing wired into their CI, not budget-conscious shoppers comparing every testing tool on cost. GitHub: At $4/seat, GitHub undercuts most serious competitors on the entry paid tier, using Free as a wedge to keep the entire developer world inside its ecosystem. Enterprise at $21 is where they extract real revenue, positioned as the default choice for orgs already bought into GitHub Actions, Copilot, and the broader Microsoft stack.

Still deciding? See the best Chromatic alternatives or the best GitHub alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.