Chromatic vs Inngest Pricing (2026)

Which one is cheaper?

Inngest is the cheaper option, starting at $99/mo vs $179/mo for Chromatic.

Can I use either one for free?

Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.

How do they charge?

Different approach here. Chromatic uses usage-based pricing, while Inngest goes with hybrid. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. Chromatic: At $179-399/mo before Enterprise, Chromatic sits mid-to-premium for a specialized visual testing tool — it's not competing on price against generic QA platforms, it's justifying the spend to teams already sold on Storybook-driven workflows. They're chasing teams that have outgrown manual visual QA and need automated snapshot testing wired into their CI, not budget-conscious shoppers comparing every testing tool on cost. Inngest: Inngest sits mid-market — not a bargain-bin queue library, but not charging enterprise workflow-engine prices out of the gate either. They're clearly courting teams who'd otherwise hand-roll job queues or duct-tape together Celery/SQS/Temporal, betting that predictable entry pricing plus scary-precise usage add-ons wins developers first, then expands revenue as usage compounds.

Still deciding? See the best Chromatic alternatives or the best Inngest alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.