CockroachDB vs Nhost Pricing (2026)
How do these two stack up on price? Here's what each one costs, what you get, and where the value sits.
| CockroachDB pricing | Nhost pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at | $0/mo | $25/mo |
| Number of plans | 2 | 4 |
| Free plan | — | |
| Free trial | — | |
| Pricing model | usage-based | hybrid |
Price is one row. To weigh the features too, use our feature comparison template →
Standard
- Shared infrastructure
- 99.99% availability SLA
- Single- or multi-region, on AWS and GCP
- Usage-based storage
- Row-level security, column-level encryption, private connectivity
- CDC add-on available
- 1-hour P1 support response
Mission Critical
- Dedicated infrastructure
- 99.999% availability SLA with multi-region
- AWS, GCP and Azure
- Provisioned storage, or usage-based storage (preview)
- Egress controls, CMEK, PCI DSS & HIPAA compliance
- All add-ons available
- 30-minute P1 support response
Starter
- 1 GB database
- 1 GB storage
- 5 GB egress
- Functions
- Realtime APIs
- IaC
- Automated deployments
- Unlimited users
- OAuth providers
- Community support
Pro
Popular- 10 GB database
- 50 GB storage
- 50 GB egress
- Automated backups
- Point in time recovery
- Bring your own services
- Managed Grafana (Metrics & Alerting)
- Email support
- Addons (AI toolkit, custom domains, etc)
Team
- SOC 2 Type II
- Email support SLA
- Dedicated discord channel
- Connect to external databases
- Advanced GraphQL features
- HIPAA (coming soon)
Enterprise
- SLAs
- Dedicated technical account manager
- Dedicated clusters (add-on)
CockroachDB vs Nhost FAQ
- Which one is cheaper?
- CockroachDB starts lower at $0/mo, compared to $25/mo for Nhost.
- Can I use either one for free?
- Nhost has a free plan. CockroachDB doesn't — though they do offer a free trial.
- How do they charge?
- Different approach here. CockroachDB uses usage-based pricing, while Nhost goes with hybrid. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.
- Which one is a better deal?
- Depends on what you need. CockroachDB: This isn't a budget play — usage-based vCPU pricing plus a premium Mission Critical tier signals they're chasing teams who need serious distributed-SQL muscle (multi-region, strong consistency) and are willing to pay for it, going head-to-head with Google Spanner and Yugabyte more than commodity Postgres hosting. The lack of a free plan reinforces that they're not fishing for hobbyists. Nhost: Against Supabase and Firebase, Nhost's free and Pro tiers are competitively priced and aimed at the same indie-dev and small-team audience. But that $599 Team tier is a big leap with no clear mid-tier bridge, which makes them look thinner in the mid-market compared to competitors who ladder pricing more gradually before enterprise.
Still deciding? See the best CockroachDB alternatives or the best Nhost alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.
Stop checking your competitors manually.
Outmano watches your competitors' prices and features for you. See how competitor pricing monitoring works.
Try Outmano free »
14-day free trial