CockroachDB vs Supabase Pricing (2026)

How do these two stack up on price? Here's what each one costs, what you get, and where the value sits.

CockroachDB pricing Supabase pricing
Starts at $0/mo $25/mo
Number of plans 2 4
Free plan —
Free trial —
Pricing model usage-based hybrid

Price is one row. To weigh the features too, use our feature comparison template →

Standard

$0/mo
  • Shared infrastructure
  • 99.99% availability SLA
  • Single- or multi-region, on AWS and GCP
  • Usage-based storage
  • Row-level security, column-level encryption, private connectivity
  • CDC add-on available
  • 1-hour P1 support response

Mission Critical

$0/mo
  • Dedicated infrastructure
  • 99.999% availability SLA with multi-region
  • AWS, GCP and Azure
  • Provisioned storage, or usage-based storage (preview)
  • Egress controls, CMEK, PCI DSS & HIPAA compliance
  • All add-ons available
  • 30-minute P1 support response

Free

$0/mo
  • Unlimited API requests
  • 50,000 monthly active users
  • 500 MB database size
  • 5 GB egress
  • 5 GB cached egress
  • 1 GB file storage
  • Community support

Pro

Popular
$25/mo
  • 100,000 monthly active users
  • 8 GB disk size per project
  • 250 GB egress
  • 250 GB cached egress
  • 100 GB file storage
  • Email support
  • Daily backups stored for 7 days
  • 7-day log retention
  • Add Log Drains

Team

$599/mo
  • SOC2 & ISO 27001
  • Project-scoped and read-only access
  • HIPAA available as paid add-on
  • SSO for Supabase Dashboard
  • Priority email support & SLAs
  • Daily backups stored for 14 days
  • 28-day log retention

Enterprise

Custom
  • Designated Support manager
  • Uptime SLAs
  • Supports AWS PrivateLink
  • 24×7×365 premium enterprise support
  • Private Slack channel
  • Custom Security Questionnaires

CockroachDB vs Supabase FAQ

Which one is cheaper?
CockroachDB starts lower at $0/mo, compared to $25/mo for Supabase.
Can I use either one for free?
Supabase has a free plan. CockroachDB doesn't — though they do offer a free trial.
How do they charge?
Different approach here. CockroachDB uses usage-based pricing, while Supabase goes with hybrid. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.
Which one is a better deal?
Depends on what you need. CockroachDB: This isn't a budget play — usage-based vCPU pricing plus a premium Mission Critical tier signals they're chasing teams who need serious distributed-SQL muscle (multi-region, strong consistency) and are willing to pay for it, going head-to-head with Google Spanner and Yugabyte more than commodity Postgres hosting. The lack of a free plan reinforces that they're not fishing for hobbyists. Supabase: Supabase undercuts Firebase and traditional managed Postgres on entry price, using the free tier and cheap Pro plan to hook indie devs and startups away from rolling their own infra. The jump to $599 for Team is steep though, positioning it less as 'affordable at scale' and more as a wedge to land small teams cheap then monetize hard once they're locked into Postgres, Auth, and Storage.

Still deciding? See the best CockroachDB alternatives or the best Supabase alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.

Stop checking your competitors manually.

Outmano watches your competitors' prices and features for you. See how competitor pricing monitoring works.

Try Outmano free »

14-day free trial