CockroachDB vs Turso Pricing (2026)

Which one is cheaper?

One or both use custom pricing, so it depends on your specific needs.

Can I use either one for free?

Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.

How do they charge?

Both use a usage-based model, so the comparison is straightforward — it comes down to features and limits at each price point.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. CockroachDB: At $0.18/hr for 2 vCPUs, they're positioning competitively against managed Postgres alternatives like AlloyDB or Aurora, but the distributed SQL angle means they're really gunning for teams that have outgrown single-region databases — not the cheapest option, but cheaper than building multi-region resilience yourself. Turso: Turso is playing the affordable edge-database angle against PlanetScale and Neon, undercutting on entry price while targeting the SQLite-on-the-edge niche that neither fully owns. They're not trying to beat RDS on enterprise credibility — they're winning on developer experience and cost for distributed, low-latency use cases.

Still deciding? See the best CockroachDB alternatives or the best Turso alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.