Descope vs Frontegg Pricing (2026)

Which one is cheaper?

One or both use custom pricing, so it depends on your specific needs.

Can I use either one for free?

Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.

How do they charge?

Different approach here. Descope uses hybrid pricing, while Frontegg goes with usage-based. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. Descope: Sitting between free-tier auth tools like Supabase Auth and heavyweight enterprise IAM players like Okta or Ping, Descope positions itself as the mid-market bridge — more capable than a bare-bones auth library, cheaper than a full enterprise identity suite. They're clearly trying to win teams that have outgrown DIY auth but aren't ready to sign an enterprise contract yet. Frontegg: Sitting in the self-serve middle of the identity/auth space, Frontegg undercuts enterprise-first players like Okta or Ping by letting you start free and scale usage-based rather than forcing an upfront sales conversation. They're clearly chasing product-led teams who'd otherwise build auth in-house or default to something like Auth0 before it gets expensive.

Still deciding? See the best Descope alternatives or the best Frontegg alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.