Firebase vs Supabase Pricing (2026)

Price is one row. To weigh the features too, use our feature comparison template →

Which one is cheaper?

One or both use custom pricing, so it depends on your specific needs.

Can I use either one for free?

Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.

How do they charge?

Different approach here. Firebase uses usage-based pricing, while Supabase goes with hybrid. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. Firebase: Firebase competes on accessibility, not price predictability — it's cheap to start and can get genuinely expensive at scale, which puts it in the middle of the pack once you're a real business. They're clearly optimizing to win developers early (solo devs, startups, hackathons) and bet that migration costs keep you there once you're big. Supabase: Supabase undercuts Firebase and traditional managed Postgres on entry price, using the free tier and cheap Pro plan to hook indie devs and startups away from rolling their own infra. The jump to $599 for Team is steep though, positioning it less as 'affordable at scale' and more as a wedge to land small teams cheap then monetize hard once they're locked into Postgres, Auth, and Storage.

Still deciding? See the best Firebase alternatives or the best Supabase alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.