InfluxDB vs Neon Pricing (2026)

Which one is cheaper?

One or both use custom pricing, so it depends on your specific needs.

Can I use either one for free?

Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.

How do they charge?

Different approach here. InfluxDB uses custom pricing, while Neon goes with usage-based. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. InfluxDB: They're threading the needle between open-source time-series tools like Prometheus and the premium managed observability platforms — not the cheapest option once usage scales, but cheaper than purpose-built enterprise APM vendors. The AWS/GCP/Azure marketplace availability signals they're actively targeting cloud-native teams who already have committed spend to burn. Neon: Neon is positioning as the serverless-native alternative to traditional managed Postgres providers like RDS or Supabase — competitive on the low end with a generous free tier, but the Scale tier pricing suggests they're not trying to be the cheapest option at volume. They're going after developers who want autoscaling without the overhead of managing infrastructure.

Still deciding? See the best InfluxDB alternatives or the best Neon alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.