InVideo vs Auphonic Pricing (2026)
How do these two stack up on price? Here's what each one costs, what you get, and where the value sits.
Plus
- 75 credits/mo.
- Access to all AI models including Seedance 2.5, Veo 3.1 & Kling 3
- Access to all AI workflows
- Access to AI video trends
- 4 AI avatars & voice clones
- Limited concurrency
- 20 GB storage
- 100 iStock
- Unlimited exports without watermark
Max
Popular- 390 credits/mo.
- Access to all AI models including Seedance 2.5, Veo 3.1 & Kling 3
- Access to all AI workflows
- Access to AI video trends
- 16 AI avatars & voice clones
- 2x more concurrency than Plus
- 100 GB storage
- 200 iStock
- Unlimited exports without watermark
Generative
- 800 credits/mo.
- Access to all AI models including Seedance 2.5, Veo 3.1 & Kling 3
- Access to all AI workflows
- Access to AI video trends
- 40 AI avatars & voice clones
- 10x more concurrency than Plus
- 2 TB storage
- 1000 iStock
- Unlimited exports without watermark
Elite
- 4250 credits/mo.
- Access to all AI models including Seedance 2.5, Veo 3.1 & Kling 3
- Access to all AI workflows
- Access to AI video trends
- 200 AI avatars & voice clones
- 20x more concurrency than Plus
- 10 TB storage
- 5000 iStock
- Unlimited exports without watermark
Auphonic Free
- Enjoy Auphonic for 2 h per month
- Intelligent Leveler
- Noise & Reverb Reduction
- Filtering, AutoEQ & BWE
- Loudness specifications
- Multitrack productions
- Filler & Silence cutting
- Encoding, metadata & chapters
- Video support & audiograms
- Connect to external services
- Automatic publishing
- Auphonic API access
- Auphonic CLI
- Includes Auphonic jingle
- Support
Recurring Credits Yearly
Popular- Intelligent Leveler
- Noise & Reverb Reduction
- Filtering, AutoEQ & BWE
- Loudness specifications
- Multitrack productions
- Filler & Silence cutting
- Multilingual speech recognition
- Automatic shownotes and chapters
- Encoding, metadata & chapters
- Video support & audiograms
- Connect to external services
- Automatic publishing
- Auphonic API access
- Auphonic CLI
- Watch folders
- Batch productions
- Support
- Early access to new features
One-Time Credits
- Intelligent Leveler
- Noise & Reverb Reduction
- Filtering, AutoEQ & BWE
- Loudness specifications
- Multitrack productions
- Filler & Silence cutting
- Multilingual speech recognition
- Automatic shownotes and chapters
- Encoding, metadata & chapters
- Video support & audiograms
- Connect to external services
- Automatic publishing
- Auphonic API access
- Auphonic CLI
- Watch folders
- Batch productions
- Support
- Early access to new features
InVideo vs Auphonic FAQ
- Which one is cheaper?
- Auphonic is the cheaper option, starting at $13/mo vs $17/mo for InVideo.
- Can I use either one for free?
- Auphonic has a free plan. InVideo doesn't — you'll need to pay from day one.
- How do they charge?
- Different approach here. InVideo uses hybrid pricing, while Auphonic goes with usage-based. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.
- Which one is a better deal?
- Depends on what you need. InVideo: InVideo sits in the affordable-to-mid range for AI video tools at the entry point ($17/mo undercuts a lot of the Synthesia/Pictory crowd), but that Elite tier at $900/mo is a steep premium jump that signals they're chasing agencies and enterprise video teams, not just solo creators. The lack of a free plan or trial is a bold move in a category where competitors often dangle free credits to hook users. Auphonic: At $13/mo for the yearly plan, Auphonic undercuts most premium audio post-production tools that charge flat SaaS-style subscriptions regardless of usage. They're positioned as the lean, technical option for people who want to pay for exactly what they process, not a bundled suite of unused features.
Still deciding? See the best InVideo alternatives or the best Auphonic alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.
Keep tabs on both.
We'll monitor pricing changes for InVideo and Auphonic and let you know when something moves. See how competitor pricing monitoring works.