Neon vs Supabase Pricing (2026)

Price is one row. To weigh the features too, use our feature comparison template →

Which one is cheaper?

One or both use custom pricing, so it depends on your specific needs.

Can I use either one for free?

Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.

How do they charge?

Different approach here. Neon uses usage-based pricing, while Supabase goes with hybrid. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. Neon: Neon isn't competing on a low headline price — it's competing on architecture, pitching serverless Postgres with instant branching to teams who'd otherwise run RDS or self-hosted Postgres. The usage-based model makes it cheap to start but hard to benchmark against flat-rate competitors like Supabase, which puts pressure on Neon to prove the 'typical spend' numbers hold up in practice. Supabase: Supabase undercuts Firebase and traditional managed Postgres on entry price, using the free tier and cheap Pro plan to hook indie devs and startups away from rolling their own infra. The jump to $599 for Team is steep though, positioning it less as 'affordable at scale' and more as a wedge to land small teams cheap then monetize hard once they're locked into Postgres, Auth, and Storage.

Still deciding? See the best Neon alternatives or the best Supabase alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.