Northflank vs Deno Deploy Pricing (2026)
How do these two stack up on price? Here's what each one costs, what you get, and where the value sits.
| Northflank pricing | Deno Deploy pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at | Custom | $20/mo |
| Number of plans | 3 | 4 |
| Free plan | ||
| Free trial | — | — |
| Pricing model | usage-based | hybrid |
Price is one row. To weigh the features too, use our feature comparison template →
Sandbox
- Always-on-compute – no sleeping :)
- 2× free services
- 1× free database
- 2× free cron jobs
Pay-as-you-go
- Only pay for consumption
- Infinitely scalable
- 6+ cloud regions, 600 BYOC regions
- Deploy with CPU & GPU
Enterprise
- Run in your VPC
- 24/7 Support & SLA
- FDE Onboarding
- 100+ Enterprise features
Free
- Requests/month: 1M
- Egress Bandwidth: 20GiB
- Custom domains: 5
- Active CPU: 10 hr
- Memory time: 150 GiB-hr
- Revision storage: 10 GiB
- Apps: 10
- Concurrent builds: 1
- Builds per hour: 15
- KV storage: 1 GiB
- KV read units/mo (4KiB): 1,000,000
- KV write units/mo (1KiB): 500,000
- Log streaming API
- Logs & traces retention: 1 Day
- App metrics: 1 Month
- Team members: 3
- Community support
Pro
- Requests/month: 5M (then $2/M)
- Egress Bandwidth: 200GiB (then $0.20/GiB)
- Custom domains: 100
- Wildcard subdomains
- Active CPU: 50 hr (then $0.10/hr)
- Memory time: 750 GiB-hr (then $0.025/GiB-hr)
- Revision storage: 50 GiB (then $0.08/GiB-mo)
- Apps: 50
- Concurrent builds: 3
- Builds per hour: 60
- Sandboxes
- Concurrent sandboxes: 3
- Volume storage: 5 GiB (then $0.20/GiB-mo)
- KV storage: 5 GiB (then $0.75/GiB)
- KV read units/mo (4KiB): 5,000,000 (then $1/M)
- KV write units/mo (1KiB): 2,500,000 (then $2.50/M)
- Log streaming API
- Logs & traces retention: 1 Week
- App metrics: 3 Months
- Team members: 10
- Community support
- Email support
Builder
Popular- Requests/month: 25M (then $2/M)
- Egress Bandwidth: 2,000GiB (then $0.20/GiB)
- Custom domains: 1,000
- Wildcard subdomains
- Active CPU: 500 hr (then $0.10/hr)
- Memory time: 7,500 GiB-hr (then $0.025/GiB-hr)
- Revision storage: 500 GiB (then $0.08/GiB-mo)
- Apps: 10,000
- Concurrent builds: 20
- Builds per hour: 250
- Sandboxes
- Concurrent sandboxes: 20
- Volume storage: 50 GiB (then $0.20/GiB-mo)
- KV storage: 10 GiB (then $0.75/GiB)
- KV read units/mo (4KiB): 25,000,000 (then $1/M)
- KV write units/mo (1KiB): 12,500,000 (then $2.50/M)
- Log streaming API
- Logs & traces retention: 1 Week
- App metrics: 3 Months
- Team members: 25
- Community support
- Email support
Enterprise
- Requests/month: Custom
- Egress Bandwidth: Custom
- Custom domains: Unlimited
- Wildcard subdomains
- Active CPU: Custom
- Memory time: Custom
- Revision storage: Custom
- Apps: Custom
- Concurrent builds: Custom
- Builds per hour: Custom
- Sandboxes
- Concurrent sandboxes: Custom
- Volume storage: Custom
- KV storage: Custom
- KV read units/mo (4KiB): Custom
- KV write units/mo (1KiB): Custom
- Log streaming API
- Logs & traces retention: Custom
- App metrics: Custom
- Team members: Custom
- Community support
- Email support
- Email support SLA
- Onboarding support
- Reliability SLA: 99.95%
- SOC2 Type 1
- DPA
Northflank vs Deno Deploy FAQ
- Which one is cheaper?
- One or both use custom pricing, so it depends on your specific needs.
- Can I use either one for free?
- Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.
- How do they charge?
- Different approach here. Northflank uses usage-based pricing, while Deno Deploy goes with hybrid. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.
- Which one is a better deal?
- Depends on what you need. Northflank: Northflank undercuts the 'enterprise PaaS' crowd like Platform.sh by letting anyone start at zero cost and scale purely with usage, positioning it closer to Railway or Render than to pricier managed Kubernetes platforms. It's chasing engineering teams who want cloud-native flexibility (including GPU workloads) without paying a premium markup just for orchestration. Deno Deploy: Deno Deploy sits in the mid-tier of the edge/serverless hosting space — pricier than raw cloud primitives (Cloudflare Workers, Lambda) but cheaper and simpler than enterprise PaaS platforms. They're clearly going after developers who want Vercel-like DX without Vercel's pricing complexity, while still leaving room for big spenders to land in Enterprise.
Still deciding? See the best Northflank alternatives or the best Deno Deploy alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.
Stop checking your competitors manually.
Outmano watches your competitors' prices and features for you. See how competitor pricing monitoring works.
Try Outmano free »
14-day free trial