Supabase vs PlanetScale Pricing (2026)

Which one is cheaper?

PlanetScale is the cheaper option, starting at $5/mo vs $25/mo for Supabase.

Can I use either one for free?

Supabase has a free plan. PlanetScale doesn't — you'll need to pay from day one.

How do they charge?

Different approach here. Supabase uses hybrid pricing, while PlanetScale goes with usage-based. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. Supabase: Supabase undercuts Firebase and traditional Postgres hosting on entry price, using the free and $25 tiers to hook indie devs and small startups away from rolling their own backend. But that Pro-to-Team gap ($25 to $599) is huge compared to competitors with more gradual mid-tier steps, so they're clearly not trying to compete for mid-market on price — they want you locked in cheap early, then captive when compliance needs kick in. PlanetScale: PlanetScale sits at the premium end of the managed MySQL/database space — pricier than raw RDS or a self-hosted Vitess cluster, but selling the promise of zero-downtime schema changes and horizontal scaling without an ops team. They're chasing teams who've outgrown vanilla Postgres/MySQL hosting and are willing to pay for database infrastructure that just works at scale.

Still deciding? See the best Supabase alternatives or the best PlanetScale alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.