74 / 100

Sitechecker pricing teardown

https://sitechecker.pro/plans

A well-structured, agency-focused self-serve pricing page with four tiers, a highlighted Premium plan, annual discount, a 48-hour money-back guarantee, and an extremely detailed comparison matrix. Its main weaknesses are the cramped value-metric logic (websites, keywords, and prompts all scale at once), the sheer length of the comparison table, and a visual and structural oddity where the Basic plan sits below the main three-card row.

Tier structure

Basic

$99/mo ($83/mo annual)

Standard

$149/mo ($125/mo annual)

Premium

$449/mo ($375/mo annual)

Enterprise

Custom

Value metric

tiered bundle of websites, keywords, and AI prompts

How limits scale

Websites 3 → 10 → 50 → Unlimited
Keywords to track 500 → 1,000 → 5,000 → Unlimited
AI prompts to track 50 → 150 → 250 → Unlimited
Data retention 12 months → 24 months → 36 months → 60 months
Crawl pages 10,000 → 50,000 → 200,000 → Unlimited

Escalation logic

Flat monthly price per tier with resource caps that expand across plans; Premium adds white-label branding and bulk project tools, while Enterprise removes caps and adds services like a success manager and custom integrations. Core features (unlimited users, recrawls, AI model tracking, API) are included in every plan.

Psychological anchors

  • Highlighted recommended plan — Premium has a colored border, a 'Popular' badge, and a solid filled CTA, while the other tiers use outline buttons, steering attention to the middle-upper tier.
  • Annual vs monthly toggle with savings framing — The toggle shows '2 months free' (~16-17% off) and each annual price carries a 'Save $X' badge (e.g., Save $298 / Save $898), making the discount concrete in dollar terms.
  • Enterprise as price anchor — A large 'Custom' price with 'Talk to sales' sits next to the $375-449 Premium plan, making Premium feel like the sensible choice.
  • Free trial entry point — Every paid plan offers 'Try for free', lowering the barrier to entry and letting users commit after experiencing value.
  • Risk reversal — A prominent 48-hour money-back guarantee with payment logos (Amex, Mastercard, Visa) sits below the comparison table.
  • Social proof — A logo strip (360 Agency, Synlighet, Beacon, Authentic, Kerkamedia, Media+Doctors) under 'Trusted by fast-growing and enterprise agencies worldwide'.
  • Persona-based plan descriptions — Each tier is labeled by audience ('consultants and tiny teams', 'small agencies scaling up', 'mid-size and niche agencies', 'large agencies') to help visitors self-select.
  • Round pricing — Annual prices use non-charm numbers like $83, $125, $375; Standard drops to $125 annually versus $149 monthly.

What this page is optimizing for

Self-serve conversion for agencies, with enterprise lead capture as a secondary path. Prices are public, every paid tier has a free-trial CTA, and the Premium plan is visually pushed, while Enterprise routes to sales.

Red flags

  • The Basic plan is placed in a separate strip beneath the three main cards, which breaks the left-to-right good-better-best flow and makes the entry tier easy to overlook.
  • Websites, keywords, and prompts all scale simultaneously, so it is hard for a buyer to know which limit will force an upgrade or which plan fits their actual usage.
  • The page's text contains multiple CTA variants per tier (Subscribe now, Try for free, Your Plan, Book a demo), which can create button clutter or confusion.
  • The jump from Standard ($125-149) to Premium ($375-449) is about 3x, steeper than the healthy 2-3x norm, with the upgrade driven mostly by white-label branding and bulk tools.
  • The Enterprise card lists nearly the same quantified limits as Premium ('Unlimited' everywhere) with no clear pricing hint, leaving the reason to talk to sales vague.
  • The detailed comparison matrix is extremely long (100+ rows), and many rows are checkmarks identical across tiers, which buries the real differentiators.
  • Data retention and crawl page limits are only visible deep in the comparison table rather than on the plan cards.
  • The FAQ is collapsed and focused on billing mechanics; it does not address fit questions like 'which plan do I need?'
  • Premium plan annual savings are shown in dollars, but monthly users see no clear nudge on how the discount compares to their usage.

Best-practices scorecard

What works · 4

  • Clear recommended tier — Premium carries a 'Popular' badge, a highlighted border, and a filled CTA that distinguishes it from the other plans.
  • Visible prices — Prices for Basic, Standard, and Premium are shown openly in USD; only Enterprise is custom.
  • Annual discount offered — A monthly/annual toggle advertises '2 months free' with explicit dollar savings per plan.
  • Trust signals present — A customer logo strip, a 48-hour money-back guarantee, and payment brand logos build credibility.

Half measures · 4

  • Value metric matches usage — Websites, keywords, and prompts suit agencies, but three metrics move at once, making it hard to know which one will drive upgrades.
  • Tier differences are scannable — The top cards show key limits clearly, but the very long comparison table with many identical checkmarks dilutes the real differences.
  • FAQ or objection handling — An FAQ and refund policy exist, but they cover billing mechanics rather than plan selection or value objections.
  • Clear CTAs per tier — Each tier has a distinct CTA ('Try for free', 'Talk to sales'), but the Basic plan placement and multiple hidden CTA variants (Subscribe now / Your Plan / Book a demo) add some ambiguity.