72 / 100

Zed pricing teardown

https://zed.dev/pricing

Zed presents a clean, transparent three-tier page (Personal $0, Pro $10, Business $30/seat) with a highlighted Pro plan and a long, genuinely useful FAQ that handles most objections. The structure is easy to scan and developer-friendly, but there is no annual option, no enterprise anchor tier, and a mixed value metric (flat fee + usage tokens + per-seat) that makes true cost harder to predict.

Tier structure

Personal

$0 forever

Pro

$10/mo (14-day free trial)

Business

$30/seat/mo

Value metric

hybrid: flat fee (Pro), per seat (Business), plus usage-based tokens

How limits scale

Edit predictions Not listed → Unlimited → Unlimited
Included AI tokens None (bring your own keys) → $5/mo → None bundled (standard usage rates)
Price per month $0 → $10 → $30 per seat

Escalation logic

Personal is a free, BYO-keys editor; Pro adds Zed-hosted AI with $5 of tokens included and usage billing beyond; Business layers org-level admin, governance, and unified spend on top per seat. The jump is more about audience (individual vs. team) than a strict good-better-best feature ladder.

Psychological anchors

  • Highlighted recommended plan — The Pro card is visually elevated with a blue tint, a shadow, a solid blue primary CTA, and a 'Free Trial' toggle, nudging visitors toward the middle tier.
  • Free tier as entry anchor — Personal at $0 forever lowers the barrier to trying the editor and makes the $10 Pro price feel small by comparison.
  • Round, no-frills pricing — Clean $0 / $10 / $30 numbers fit the developer-tool brand and signal transparency rather than marketing tricks.
  • Free trial with no credit card — A 14-day Pro trial with $5 of usage and no card required (explained in the FAQ) reduces commitment friction.
  • Social proof logo bar — A logo strip (Clarity, Cloudflare, CODER, Dashbit, DataStax and others) sits above the plan cards to build credibility.
  • Sales-assisted escape hatch — 'Order forms available at 25+ seats' under Business hints at enterprise contracts without hiding the self-serve price.

What this page is optimizing for

Self-serve conversion with a team-expansion path. Public prices, instant-start CTAs ('Download Now', 'Get Started'), a no-card trial, and a self-serve Business plan with no seat minimum show it is built to get developers in fast and then upsell admin controls to teams.

Red flags

  • No annual billing option or discount is shown, leaving an easy revenue and retention lever unused.
  • The mixed value metric (flat $10, $5 included tokens, then API price +10%, plus per-seat Business) makes total cost hard to forecast, and the explanation is buried in the FAQ.
  • Business has no free trial and no bundled AI credits, so the $30/seat decision is harder to justify for teams.
  • SSO, SAML, and SCIM are 'planned but not currently available', which can block larger or security-conscious buyers.
  • There is no true enterprise or top-end anchor tier; Business at $30 is a weak anchor, and the Business cards lack a differentiated visual emphasis.
  • Feature lists on the cards are sparse (Personal has just one bullet), so tier differences are not comparable at a glance and there is no comparison table.
  • Limits that matter, such as hosted model access and token overage rules, are only clarified in the FAQ rather than on the cards.

Best-practices scorecard

What works · 5

  • Clear recommended tier — Pro is visually highlighted with a tinted card, shadow, and the only filled primary CTA.
  • Visible prices — All three plans show explicit prices ($0, $10, $30/seat) with no 'contact sales' gating.
  • FAQ or objection handling — A thorough FAQ covers plan fit, trials, seat minimums, tokens, overages, BYO keys, and disabling AI.
  • Trust signals present — A customer logo bar and the open-source positioning add credibility, though there are no testimonials or security badges.
  • Clear CTAs per tier — Each card has a distinct CTA (Download Now, Get Started, Get started), with Pro's styled as the primary action.

Half measures · 2

  • Value metric matches usage — Per-seat for teams and token-based overage for AI track real usage, but combining flat, seat, and usage metrics is confusing.
  • Tier differences are scannable — Cards are clean with short checklists, but there is no side-by-side comparison and Personal's feature list is minimal.

What's missing · 1

  • Annual discount offered — No annual toggle or discounted yearly pricing appears; the FAQ only mentions month-to-month plans.