Which one is cheaper?

One or both use custom pricing, so it depends on your specific needs.

Can I use either one for free?

Baseten has a free plan. Luma AI doesn't — you'll need to pay from day one.

Different approach here. Baseten uses usage-based pricing, while Luma AI goes with hybrid. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. Baseten: Sitting in the middle-to-premium range for ML infra, Baseten isn't competing on being the cheapest raw GPU hours — that's a race to the bottom against hyperscalers. Instead they're chasing teams that want managed model-serving infrastructure without building it themselves, using the free entry point to hook developers before upselling the production-grade tiers. Luma AI: Luma is sitting at the premium end of the AI video space: a $30 entry point with no free tier is a deliberate choice to skip hobbyists and court working creators and studios. That $300 Ultra tier is a bold anchor that makes Pro look like the sensible pick while capturing power users who'd otherwise burn through competitors' credits.

Baseten vs Luma AI Pricing (2026)

How do these two stack up on price? Here's what each one costs, what you get, and where the value sits.

	Baseten pricing	Luma AI pricing
Starts at	Custom	$30/mo
Number of plans	3	5
Free plan		—
Free trial	—	—
Pricing model	usage-based	hybrid

Price is one row. To weigh the features too, use our feature comparison template →

Baseten pricing

Official page

Basic

$0/mo

Dedicated deployments
Model APIs
Training
Fast cold starts
SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliant
Email and in-app chat support

Pro

Custom

Priority access to high-demand GPUs
Dedicated compute
Higher Model API rate limits
Hands-on engineering expertise
Dedicated support on Slack and Zoom

Enterprise

Custom

Custom SLAs
Self-host deployments
On-demand flex compute
Use existing cloud commitments
Full control over data residency
Advanced security and compliance
Custom global regions
Advanced RBAC with Teams

Luma AI pricing

Official page

Plus

$30/mo

10,000 credits
Luma and third-party image and video models
Edit access for guest collaborators
Commercial use

Pro

$90/mo

40,000 credits
4x usage with the Luma Agents

Ultra

$300/mo

150,000 credits
15x usage with the Luma Agents

Team

Custom

Manage and add team members
Projects, team organization, and team-wide sharing
Usage analytics
Shared team credits
SSO

Enterprise

Custom

Enterprise commitments
Dedicated education and training
Custom fine-tuning

Baseten vs Luma AI FAQ

Which one is cheaper?: One or both use custom pricing, so it depends on your specific needs.
Can I use either one for free?: Baseten has a free plan. Luma AI doesn't — you'll need to pay from day one.
How do they charge?: Different approach here. Baseten uses usage-based pricing, while Luma AI goes with hybrid. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.
Which one is a better deal?: Depends on what you need. Baseten: Sitting in the middle-to-premium range for ML infra, Baseten isn't competing on being the cheapest raw GPU hours — that's a race to the bottom against hyperscalers. Instead they're chasing teams that want managed model-serving infrastructure without building it themselves, using the free entry point to hook developers before upselling the production-grade tiers. Luma AI: Luma is sitting at the premium end of the AI video space: a $30 entry point with no free tier is a deliberate choice to skip hobbyists and court working creators and studios. That $300 Ultra tier is a bold anchor that makes Pro look like the sensible pick while capturing power users who'd otherwise burn through competitors' credits.

Still deciding? See the best Baseten alternatives or the best Luma AI alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.

Stop checking your competitors manually.

Outmano watches your competitors' prices and features for you. See how competitor pricing monitoring works.

Try Outmano free »

14-day free trial