Cookiebot vs Malwarebytes ThreatDown Pricing (2026)

Which one is cheaper?

One or both use custom pricing, so it depends on your specific needs.

Can I use either one for free?

Cookiebot has a free plan. Malwarebytes ThreatDown doesn't — you'll need to pay from day one.

How do they charge?

Different approach here. Cookiebot uses usage-based pricing, while Malwarebytes ThreatDown goes with flat-rate. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. Cookiebot: At $8–$96/mo for self-serve, Cookiebot sits in the affordable-to-mid range for consent management — accessible enough to win SMBs who need GDPR compliance without enterprise budgets, but the Corporate/Usercentrics Advanced tier signals they're also chasing larger orgs. They're not the cheapest option in the category, but the free plan and low entry price make them a credible default choice for developers and small teams. Malwarebytes ThreatDown: Custom pricing across every tier makes it impossible to benchmark publicly, which is a deliberate move — they're likely competing with CrowdStrike Falcon and SentinelOne in mid-market deals where procurement happens over calls, not credit cards. They're not going after the SMB self-serve crowd here; ThreatDown is positioned as a credible enterprise-lite option with MDR services to sweeten the pitch.

Still deciding? See the best Cookiebot alternatives or the best Malwarebytes ThreatDown alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.