FieldPulse vs Arborgold Pricing (2026)
How do these two stack up on price? Here's what each one costs, what you get, and where the value sits.
| FieldPulse pricing | Arborgold pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at | Custom | $149/mo |
| Number of plans | 3 | 3 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Pricing model | per-seat | hybrid |
Price is one row. To weigh the features too, use our feature comparison template →
Essentials
- Customer Management
- Scheduling & Dispatching
- Work Order Management
- Estimates & Invoices
- Mobile App
- Workflow Automation
Professional
- Customer Management
- Scheduling & Dispatching
- Work Order Management
- Estimates & Invoices
- Mobile App
- Workflow Automation
- Project Management
- QuickBooks Sync
Enterprise
- Customer Management
- Scheduling & Dispatching
- Work Order Management
- Estimates & Invoices
- Mobile App
- Workflow Automation
- Project Management
- QuickBooks Sync
- Multi-Location Management
- Open API
Starter
- CRM
- Estimating
- Unlimited Land Measurements
- Drag and Drop Scheduling
- Route Optimization
- Job Management
- Communications & Messaging
- Invoicing & E-Payments
- Reporting & Analytics
- Crew Time Tracking
- Standard Integrations
Professional
Popular- Job Costing
- Renewals
- Material Inventory Management
- Chemical Tracking
- Autoprice Calculator
- Advanced Resources
- Advanced Integrations
Enterprise
- Plant and Tree Inventory Mapping
- Sales Automation
- Custom templates
- Expense Tracking
- Equipment Maintenance Tracking
- Project Scheduling
- Enterprise Integrations
FieldPulse vs Arborgold FAQ
- Which one is cheaper?
- One or both use custom pricing, so it depends on your specific needs.
- Can I use either one for free?
- Neither has a free plan.
- How do they charge?
- Different approach here. FieldPulse uses per-seat pricing, while Arborgold goes with hybrid. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.
- Which one is a better deal?
- Depends on what you need. FieldPulse: Hiding every price behind a 'Contact Us' wall signals they're playing a mid-market to upmarket game, competing with the likes of ServiceTitan and Housecall Pro rather than undercutting cheap DIY tools. No free trial or free plan reinforces that they're chasing sales-assisted deals with established field service businesses, not self-serve solo operators. Arborgold: This is mid-market vertical SaaS pricing, not a cheap-and-cheerful play. The annual contract requirement plus no free tier or trial signals they're targeting committed green-industry businesses willing to pay for tools built specifically for landscapers, rather than competing on price against generic field-service apps.
Still deciding? See the best FieldPulse alternatives or the best Arborgold alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.
Stop checking your competitors manually.
Outmano watches your competitors' prices and features for you. See how competitor pricing monitoring works.
Try Outmano free »
14-day free trial