FireHydrant vs Statuspage Pricing (2026)
How do these two stack up on price? Here's what each one costs, what you get, and where the value sits.
| FireHydrant | Statuspage | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at | $25/mo | $29/mo |
| Number of plans | 3 | 5 |
| Free plan | ||
| Free trial | — | |
| Pricing model | per-seat | flat-rate |
Free
- Up to 10 responders
- 2 runbooks
- Slack & Teams chatbot
- 1 public status page
- 3 integrations
Pro
Popular- 5 runbooks
- Slack & Teams chatbot
- 1 retrospective template
- Unlimited public status pages
- Service catalog
- 10 custom fields
- 5 integrations
- On-call scheduling
- Unlimited escalation policies
- Notifications via push, Slack, Microsoft Teams, email
- Notifications via SMS and voice available for purchase
- Unlimited webhooks and alert rules
- SSO
- Standard support
Enterprise
- Viewer licenses
- Unlimited runbooks
- Private incidents
- FireHydrant AI – summaries, meeting transcripts, triage, retros, follow ups
- Unlimited retrospective templates
- Private status pages
- Incident analytics
- Unlimited custom fields
- Unlimited integrations
- Alert grouping
- Volume discounting
- Live call routing
- Notification Policy
- Slack Enterprise Grid
- Data exports
- Audit logs
- SCIM
- Multiple organizations
- SLAs
- Premium customer support
- Dedicated customer success manager and solutions engineer
Free
- 100 subscribers
- 25 components
- Two team members
- Two metrics
- Email notifications
- Slack notifications
- Microsoft Teams notifications
- Access to REST APIs
Hobby
- 250 subscribers
- 5 team members
- 5 metrics
- Email notifications
- Slack notifications
- Microsoft Teams notifications
- Basic customization
- Custom domain
- Access to REST APIs
Startup
- 1,000 subscribers
- 10 team members
- 10 metrics
- Email/SMS/webhook notifications
- Slack notifications
- Microsoft Teams notifications
- Custom CSS
- Custom domain
- Access to REST APIs
- Team member SSO (with Atlassian Guard)
Business
- 5,000 subscribers
- 25 team members
- 25 metrics
- Email/SMS/webhook notifications
- Slack notifications
- Microsoft Teams notifications
- Custom CSS/HTML/JS
- Custom domain
- Access to REST APIs
- Team member SSO (with Atlassian Guard)
- Component subscriptions
- Role-based access control
Enterprise
- 25,000 subscribers
- 50 team members
- 50 metrics
- Email/SMS/webhook notifications
- Slack notifications
- Microsoft Teams notifications
- Custom CSS/HTML/JS
- Custom domain
- Access to REST APIs
- Team member SSO (with Atlassian Guard)
- Component subscriptions
- Yearly purchase orders and invoicing available
- Role-based access control
FireHydrant vs Statuspage FAQ
- Which one is cheaper?
- FireHydrant starts lower at $25/mo, compared to $29/mo for Statuspage.
- Can I use either one for free?
- Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.
- How do they charge?
- Different approach here. FireHydrant uses per-seat pricing, while Statuspage goes with flat-rate. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.
- Which one is a better deal?
- Depends on what you need. FireHydrant: FireHydrant sits mid-market — not the cheapest incident management tool out there, but not chasing PagerDuty-style enterprise pricing either. They're positioning to win teams who've outgrown spreadsheets and Slack-only workflows but aren't ready for a bloated enterprise contract. Statuspage: Statuspage sits in the mid-to-premium range for incident communication tools — they're not the cheapest (Instatus undercuts them significantly) but they carry the Atlassian brand trust that enterprise buyers lean on. They're clearly targeting teams already in the Atlassian ecosystem who want a low-friction, credible status page without building their own.
Still deciding? See the best FireHydrant alternatives or the best Statuspage alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.
Keep tabs on both.
We'll monitor pricing changes for FireHydrant and Statuspage and let you know when something moves.