68 / 100

Hetzner pricing teardown

https://www.hetzner.com/cloud

Hetzner Cloud's page is a clean, transparent three-category pitch: public 'starting from' prices, plain-language workload guidance, and a strong cost-comparison story against hyperscalers. It has no recommended plan, no annual toggle, no trial, and the per-tier detail lives behind 'Explore this plan', so the page works well for informed developers but leaves some persuasion levers unused.

Tier structure

Cost-Optimized

from €5.99/mo

Regular Performance

from €6.49/mo

General Purpose

from €43.49/mo

Value metric

per-server resource size, billed monthly with traffic included

Escalation logic

Tiers are split by resource type (shared vs dedicated vCPUs) and workload profile rather than a classic good-better-best ladder. The jump from the two shared tiers to dedicated General Purpose is steep (~7x on entry price) and tied to sustained CPU needs, while the two shared tiers sit only ~8% apart.

Psychological anchors

  • Transparent 'starting from' pricing — Each card shows a bold entry price in euros ('€5.99', '€6.49', '€43.49 per month, excl. VAT') with 'starting from max/mo.' framing that signals a monthly cap and reduces fear of runaway usage bills.
  • Descriptive value-prop labels per tier — Cards carry plain-language positioning ('Perfect for test environments', 'Best price-performance ratio', 'Optimized for business applications') that nudges buyers toward the right fit without a 'most popular' badge.
  • Competitive price anchoring — The 'Data traffic in price comparison' section contrasts Hetzner's generous included traffic with AWS/Azure/Google egress fees, using independent sparecores.com data to anchor Hetzner as the cheap, predictable option.
  • Price calculator as a benefit — The hero benefit strip leads with 'Price calculator – Calculate cloud costs', and a 'cost check' section reinforces cost control as a core promise.
  • Social proof and trust framing — A customer quote ('best European cloud hoster… super cheap and reliable') plus 99.9% SLA, ISO 27001, C5 certification, GDPR and 'Made in Germany' badges anchor credibility.
  • Included extras reduce perceived price — Firewalls, networks, API/CLI, and free one-click apps (WordPress, Docker, Nextcloud, GitLab) are presented as included at no extra cost, raising perceived value relative to the entry price.

What this page is optimizing for

Self-serve conversion among technical buyers: prices are public, the hero CTA is 'Create cloud instance', and there is no sales-gating anywhere. The cost-comparison and calculator content is aimed at developers evaluating cheaper alternatives to hyperscalers.

Red flags

  • No tier is highlighted or badged as recommended, so there is no decoy effect and the visitor must self-diagnose between near-identical shared plans.
  • Cards show only a 'starting from' price with qualitative descriptors ('Low CPU usage', 'Medium traffic'); concrete specs (vCPU, RAM, storage, traffic) are missing, forcing a click-through to 'Explore this plan'.
  • The Cost-Optimized card is labeled 'Currently not available', which undermines the cheapest entry anchor on the page.
  • No free trial, free credit, or free tier is visible, so the first purchase requires commitment before any hands-on experience.
  • Pricing is shown excl. VAT and monthly only; there is no annual or committed-use discount, which leaves a common expansion and retention lever unused.
  • A cookie banner, location-settings prompt, and large mega-menu add noise and push the actual tier cards well below the fold.

Best-practices scorecard

What works · 3

  • Visible prices — Entry prices for all three categories are publicly shown in euros with a 'per month, excl. VAT' note, and a price calculator is linked.
  • Value metric matches usage — Pay-for-the-server-size with high included traffic and capped monthly pricing aligns cost with infrastructure used and avoids punishing growth.
  • Trust signals present — 99.9% SLA, ISO/IEC 27001, BSI C5, GDPR compliance, multi-region data centers, and a customer testimonial are all present.

Half measures · 3

  • Tier differences are scannable — Shared vs Dedicated is explained well in prose, but cards use vague qualifiers instead of comparable specs side by side.
  • FAQ or objection handling — There's a strong 'Shared vs Dedicated' explainer and a hyperscaler cost comparison, but no formal FAQ covering billing, cancellation, or hourly charging.
  • Clear CTAs per tier — Each card has 'Explore this plan' and the hero has 'Create cloud instance', but the per-tier CTA is exploratory rather than a direct signup action.

What's missing · 2

  • Clear recommended tier — No plan is badged or visually emphasized; 'Best price-performance ratio' is a text label only, not a highlighted card.
  • Annual discount offered — Only monthly billing is shown, with no annual toggle or commitment discount.