Which one is cheaper?

OnPay is the cheaper option, starting at $15/mo vs $400/mo for Ashby.

Different approach here. Ashby uses custom pricing, while OnPay goes with hybrid. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. Ashby: Ashby plays in the premium mid-market-to-enterprise recruiting space, not the cheap Greenhouse-alternative lane — $400/mo as a floor for a company with just 11-25 employees is a real signal they're not chasing scrappy startups on price. They're positioning against Greenhouse and Lever for teams that want an all-in-one ATS plus sourcing plus analytics, and betting that opaque enterprise pricing signals sophistication rather than scaring off buyers. OnPay: At $49/mo base, OnPay lands in the mid-market of payroll tools — pricier than bare-bones payroll-only competitors but cheaper than full HRIS suites like Gusto's higher tiers or Rippling. They're clearly courting small businesses that want payroll handled first and HR bolted on only if they need it, not companies shopping for an all-in-one HR platform out of the gate.

Ashby vs OnPay Pricing (2026)

	Ashby	OnPay
Starts at	$400/mo	$15/mo
Number of plans	4	2
Free plan	—	—
Free trial	—	—
Pricing model	custom	hybrid

Ashby

Official page

Foundations Plan

$400/mo

Plus Plan

Custom

Enterprise Plan

Custom

For your existing ATS

Custom

OnPay

Official page

Payroll Essentials

Popular

$49/mo

Full-service payroll
Hiring and onboarding
Team basics
Integrations and insights
Benefits admin
Expert support

HR

$15/mo

PTO dashboard and management
Onboarding workflows and eSignatures
Employee directory and org charts
Documents and records management
Equipment and software provisioning
HR insights and engagement

Ashby vs OnPay FAQ

Which one is cheaper?: OnPay is the cheaper option, starting at $15/mo vs $400/mo for Ashby.
Can I use either one for free?: Neither has a free plan.
How do they charge?: Different approach here. Ashby uses custom pricing, while OnPay goes with hybrid. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.
Which one is a better deal?: Depends on what you need. Ashby: Ashby plays in the premium mid-market-to-enterprise recruiting space, not the cheap Greenhouse-alternative lane — $400/mo as a floor for a company with just 11-25 employees is a real signal they're not chasing scrappy startups on price. They're positioning against Greenhouse and Lever for teams that want an all-in-one ATS plus sourcing plus analytics, and betting that opaque enterprise pricing signals sophistication rather than scaring off buyers. OnPay: At $49/mo base, OnPay lands in the mid-market of payroll tools — pricier than bare-bones payroll-only competitors but cheaper than full HRIS suites like Gusto's higher tiers or Rippling. They're clearly courting small businesses that want payroll handled first and HR bolted on only if they need it, not companies shopping for an all-in-one HR platform out of the gate.

Still deciding? See the best Ashby alternatives or the best OnPay alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.

Keep tabs on both.

We'll monitor pricing changes for Ashby and OnPay and let you know when something moves. See how competitor pricing monitoring works.

Track both free »