Hunter vs Lusha Pricing (2026)

Which one is cheaper?

Hunter starts lower at $49/mo, compared to $49/mo for Lusha.

Can I use either one for free?

Both offer free plans, so you can try each without paying. Start with whichever fits your workflow better and upgrade when you hit the limits.

How do they charge?

Both use a usage-based model, so the comparison is straightforward — it comes down to features and limits at each price point.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. Hunter: Hunter sits in the affordable-to-mid range for email finding tools — cheaper than Apollo or ZoomInfo's full suites, but competing directly with tools like Snov.io and Findymail. They're clearly going after SMBs and individual sales reps who want a focused, no-frills prospecting tool without paying for a bloated data platform. Lusha: Lusha sits in the mid-market of the B2B contact data space, undercutting ZoomInfo and Apollo's team plans but not trying to be the cheapest option in the room. They're going after individual contributors and lean sales teams who want quality data without an enterprise contract.

Still deciding? See the best Hunter alternatives or the best Lusha alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.