Hunter vs Woodpecker Pricing (2026)

Price is one row. To weigh the features too, use our feature comparison template →

Which one is cheaper?

Woodpecker is the cheaper option, starting at $35/mo vs $49/mo for Hunter.

Can I use either one for free?

Hunter has a free plan. Woodpecker doesn't — though they do offer a free trial.

How do they charge?

Different approach here. Hunter uses hybrid pricing, while Woodpecker goes with usage-based. That changes the math depending on your team size and usage.

Which one is a better deal?

Depends on what you need. Hunter: Hunter sits in the middle of the email-finding/verification pack — pricier than bare-bones scrapers but way cheaper than full sales intelligence platforms like ZoomInfo or Apollo's upper tiers. They're going after small-to-mid sales and marketing teams who want solid deliverability without buying an entire GTM suite. Woodpecker: Sitting in the middle of the cold-email tool pack, Woodpecker isn't chasing the rock-bottom crowd but also isn't positioning as a premium enterprise platform — the usage-based structure appeals to agencies and sales teams who don't want to pay for unused seats. They're going after teams that scale outreach volume unevenly month to month rather than teams wanting predictable flat pricing.

Still deciding? See the best Hunter alternatives or the best Woodpecker alternatives, ranked with verified pricing.